Logic is subordinated to Boyapati Sreenu’s theatrical manner and Nandamuri Balakrishna’s thunderous on-screen persona in Akhanda 2. The Akhanda universe is amplified in the sequel into a fantastical, larger-than-life world where reality is replaced with divinity, patriotism, and sheer cinematic bluster.
Akhanda 2: Thaandavam, which was released on December 12, 2025, is director Boyapati Sreenu and Balakrishna’s fourth joint venture. The movie’s eventual release was greeted with enormous buzz, sold-out tickets, and divisive internet comments despite delays and legal obstacles.
Boyapati makes it clear from the first frame that this is not a movie constrained by logic or physics. Rather, it is a mythic action-drama in which Balakrishna, equipped with a trishul, emerges as the ultimate defender of the country. The Maha Kumbh Mela is the target of a Tibetan army biowarfare strike at the start of the story, which paves the way for Balakrishna’s Akhanda to emerge as a heavenly rescuer.
Also Read: Reviews of Tere Ishk Mein and The Box Office Collection
The Balayya-Boyapati Formula
Boyapati Sreenu is known for making movies that prioritize spectacle above narrative. He intensifies his distinctive flair in Akhanda 2:
- Gravity-defying stunts in which Balakrishna defeats armies by himself.
- Patriotic Fervor– Woven into religious images, presents Akhanda as both a saint and a warrior.
- The film’s heartbeat is the thunderous background score by Thaman S, which frequently overshadows the screenplay. In contrast, Balakrishna provides what fans anticipate: unapologetic roaring language, larger-than-life heroism, and a screen persona that feeds on excess. The Boyapati-Balayya brand is fueled by his purposefully extravagant act.
Strengths and Weaknesses
| Aspect | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|
| Balakrishna’s Performance | Power-packed, commanding, tailor-made for fans | Over-the-top, alienating for neutral viewers |
| Direction (Boyapati) | Bold, unapologetic, visually grand | Sacrifices logic, coherence, and subtlety |
| Music (Thaman S) | Electrifying BGM, elevates action | Sometimes drowns narrative clarity |
| Visuals & VFX | Impressive production design, scale | Cheap CGI in parts, inconsistent quality |
| Storyline | Mythic, patriotic, devotional themes | Chaotic, verbose, lacks emotional depth |
Audience Reaction
The film’s divisive nature is reflected in the audience’s response to Akhanda 2, which has been a mixture of thundering ovation and scathing condemnation. The film is nothing less than a festival for Balakrishna’s devoted fan base; his extravagant presence, ferocious dialogue, and Boyapati’s unreserved mass approach elicited screams, whistles, and festive chants inside theaters. Many admirers accepted the patriotic and devotional overtones, viewing Akhanda as a supernatural guardian who goes above mere bravery. However, unbiased viewers and critics thought the movie was tiresome, citing its disorganized plot, overdone stunts, and illogic. This gap was exacerbated by social media, as fan clubs praised the movie’s grandeur while memes ridiculed its excesses. Essentially, Akhanda 2 evolved into a cultural event rather than a movie experience, with viewers either accepting its spectacle or writing it off as exaggerated mayhem.
The Significance of Akhanda 2
Akhanda 2 is important despite its shortcomings for a number of reasons:
- It solidifies Boyapati-Balayya collaborations as a distinct subgenre of Telugu cinema, where crazy, mass, and myth meet.
- Even in a time when reality and nuanced storytelling predominate, it captures the audience’s hunger for larger-than-life heroes.
- It demonstrates how, particularly in regional film, devotional and patriotic themes remain potent crowd-pullers.
Conclusion
Akhanda 2 is not a movie for anybody looking for realism, logic, or nuance. It is a cinematic carnival of excess in which Balakrishna roars through armies, villains, and divine battles while Boyapati Sreenu blatantly disregards physics. Critics see it as chaos disguised as film, while fans see it as a feast of popular pleasure.
In the end, the movie shows one thing: Boyapati and Balakrishna take over the scenes—and they do so with thunder, trishuls, and unabashed conviction—when reasoning leaves the theater.
Stay Connected
